1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1984 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1984 Fiat Argenta is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Fiat Argenta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Fiat Argenta (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Fiat Argenta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1602 | 1984 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | BMW | Fiat |
| Model | 1602 | Argenta |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 35 L |
