1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1987 Honda Integra
To start off, 1987 Honda Integra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 1602 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Honda Integra (113 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Because 1966 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1966 BMW 1602 has manual transmission. 1966 BMW 1602 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 1987 Honda Integra | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 1602 | Integra |
Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 113 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |