1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1602 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1602 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 467 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2580 mm |
