1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1995 Mazda 121
To start off, 1995 Mazda 121 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 1602 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 BMW 1602 (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 121. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 BMW 1602 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 1602 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1995 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 BMW 1602 (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 121. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1966 BMW 1602 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 1995 Mazda 121 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 1602 | 121 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 43 L |