1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1997 Isuzu 3.1
To start off, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 3,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Isuzu 3.1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 1602. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 has automatic transmission and 1966 BMW 1602 has manual transmission. 1966 BMW 1602 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Isuzu 3.1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 1997 Isuzu 3.1 | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | 1602 | 3.1 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 3098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |