1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1997 Jeep Dakar
To start off, 1997 Jeep Dakar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Dakar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Dakar (190 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Because 1966 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Jeep Dakar has automatic transmission and 1966 BMW 1602 has manual transmission. 1966 BMW 1602 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Jeep Dakar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1602 | 1997 Jeep Dakar | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 1602 | Dakar |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2760 mm |
