1966 BMW 1602 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 744 kg more than 1966 BMW 1602. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1602 | 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1602 | Blazer |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1684 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 71 L |
