1966 BMW 1602 vs. 2005 Suzuki X2
To start off, 2005 Suzuki X2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher.
Because 2005 Suzuki X2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 1602. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki X2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Suzuki X2 has automatic transmission and 1966 BMW 1602 has manual transmission. 1966 BMW 1602 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Suzuki X2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 2005 Suzuki X2 | |
Make | BMW | Suzuki |
Model | 1602 | X2 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2650 mm |