1966 BMW 1602 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 2006 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 1602 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 2770 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 74 L |