1966 BMW 1602 vs. 2009 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Daewoo Evanda (130 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 557 kg more than 1966 BMW 1602. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602. 2009 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 1966 BMW 1602 has manual transmission. 1966 BMW 1602 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 2009 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 1602 | Evanda |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 159 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 65 L |