1966 BMW 1602 vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 207 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (121 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Because 1966 BMW 1602 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1602. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1602 | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | BMW | Peugeot |
| Model | 1602 | 207 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 121 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 50 L |
