1966 BMW 1602 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 277 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 1602 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 130 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |