1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1950 Fiat 500
To start off, 1966 BMW 2000 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 BMW 2000 (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1950 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1950 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 2000 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1950 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1950 Fiat 500 | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 2000 | 500 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 569 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 35 L |