1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1966 BMW 2000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 495 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
Make | BMW | Hudson |
Model | 2000 | Super Wasp |
Year Released | 1966 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1599 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |