1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1966 BMW 2000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 16 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1966 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |