1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 BMW 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1966 BMW 2000. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 79 L |
