1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1967 Bristol 409
To start off, 1967 Bristol 409 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Bristol 409 weights approximately 496 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1967 Bristol 409 | |
Make | BMW | Bristol |
Model | 2000 | 409 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 81 L |