1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1967 DAF Daffodil is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 BMW 2000 (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 2000 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | BMW | DAF |
| Model | 2000 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 33 L |
