1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1977 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1977 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 806 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 1966 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 1977 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3090 mm |
