1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1981 Seat 131
To start off, 1981 Seat 131 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 BMW 2000 (101 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1981 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 2000 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1981 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 BMW 2000 (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1966 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1981 Seat 131 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 2000 | 131 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2500 mm |