1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 1982 Skoda L is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 BMW 2000 (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 BMW 2000 should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 2000 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 BMW 2000 (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 BMW 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1982 Skoda L | |
Make | BMW | Skoda |
Model | 2000 | L |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 68.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 38 L |