1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 46 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 1966 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2580 mm |