1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1986 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1986 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 2000 weights approximately 254 kg more than 1986 Skoda Rapid R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 1986 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | BMW | Skoda |
| Model | 2000 | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |
