1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 606 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 1966 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1997 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 2000 | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3040 mm |