1966 BMW 2000 vs. 1999 Rover 75
To start off, 1999 Rover 75 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rover 75 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 1966 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 1999 Rover 75 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 2000 | 75 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2750 mm |