1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2002 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 550 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 2002 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 2000 | XLR |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |