1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1966 BMW 2000. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 511 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 2000. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 2000 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1641 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 76 L |