1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2004 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2004 Ford Mondeo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mondeo (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1966 BMW 2000. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 260 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mondeo (175 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 2000. (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 2004 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2760 mm |