1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 842 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1946 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |