1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 264 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 2000. (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 2000 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1394 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |