1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 557 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 2000 | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 2000 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1661 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |