1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 261 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | BMW | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2000 | SL |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 661 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1365 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |
