1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2010 Hyundai Atos
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Atos is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 2000 weights approximately 219 kg more than 2010 Hyundai Atos.
Because 1966 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai Atos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 2010 Hyundai Atos | |
| Make | BMW | Hyundai |
| Model | 2000 | Atos |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1086 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 35 L |
