1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 21 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 2000 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |
