1966 BMW 2000 vs. 2013 BMW M3
To start off, 2013 BMW M3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW M3 weights approximately 576 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 2000 | 2013 BMW M3 | |
| Make | BMW | BMW |
| Model | 2000 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 408 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1976 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1418 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2761 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |
