1966 Bristol 409 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1967 Nissan Cedric is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bristol 409 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bristol 409 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | 409 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |