1966 Bristol 409 vs. 1968 Citroen Dyane 6
To start off, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bristol 409 weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1966 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bristol 409 | 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | |
Make | Bristol | Citroen |
Model | 409 | Dyane 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 25 L |