1966 Bristol 409 vs. 1974 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bristol 409. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bristol 409 | 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Bristol | Suzuki |
| Model | 409 | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
