1966 Bristol 409 vs. 1980 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Bristol 409.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bristol 409 | 1980 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 409 | Impala |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2960 mm |