1966 Bristol 409 vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bristol 409 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bristol 409 | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Bristol | Plymouth |
| Model | 409 | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2470 mm |
