1966 Bristol 409 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1994 Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (225 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1966 Bristol 409. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1966 Bristol 409. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 620 kg more than 1966 Bristol 409. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bristol 409. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (375 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bristol 409 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Bristol | Rover |
| Model | 409 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 4552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 375 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 100 L |
