1966 Bristol 409 vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 1999 Mazda AZ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bristol 409 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1966 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bristol 409 | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 409 | AZ |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2370 mm |