1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1966 Bristol 409. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1966 Bristol 409. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 200 kg more than 1966 Bristol 409. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bristol 409 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
| Model | 409 | F-Type |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2390 mm |
