1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1966 Bristol 409. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1966 Bristol 409. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 20 kg more than 1966 Bristol 409. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (378 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bristol 409 | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | 409 | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 378 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 70 L |
