1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 20 kg more than 1966 Bristol 409.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS. 1966 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 2003 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2003 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Bristol 409 2003 Cadillac CTS
Make Bristol Cadillac
Model 409 CTS
Year Released 1966 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5211 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 215 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 463 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 98.6 mm 83.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.1 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1600 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 81 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]