1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bristol 409. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bristol 409 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 409 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 72 L |