1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bristol 409 weights approximately 38 kg more than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bristol 409. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bristol 409 | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Bristol | Honda |
Model | 409 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 463 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1562 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 58 L |