1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1966 Bristol 409. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1966 Bristol 409.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Bristol 409. (463 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Bristol 409.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bristol 409 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
| Model | 409 | XF |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 70 L |
