1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bristol 409 (215 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bristol 409. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bristol 409 | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Bristol | Jeep |
| Model | 409 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 80 L |
