1966 Bristol 409 vs. 2013 Ford Focus
To start off, 2013 Ford Focus is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2013 Ford Focus. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bristol 409 weights approximately 279 kg more than 2013 Ford Focus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Focus. (198 Nm @ 4450 RPM). This means 1966 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Focus. 1966 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Focus has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Focus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bristol 409 | 2013 Ford Focus | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 409 | Focus |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4450 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 12.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1321 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4534 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1466 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 47 L |